MOOCs: the (Loch Ness) Monster of Higher Education?


 “MOOCs are the monster under the bed!” boomed a Dean at an academic conference just over two years ago. “And soon, they are going to come out and get us all!” Two years on and the idea of revolutionary change in higher education seemed to have been mitigated somewhat. The 2014 EFMD Annual Conference in Vienna brought out a more moderated view suggesting that they would make a contribution to teaching and learning, but they would in not way replace the traditional university. Sense at last. If MOOCs are the monster, perhaps they, or at least their underlying business model, are more of the Loch Ness variety. Talked about by many, but very difficult to find.

For an industry that is proud to trace it heritage back to Aristotle and Socrates, we have a surprising penchant for getting in a flap about the latest technology. MOOCs have been a point in case though finally after a few years things seem to be settling again. After my return from the EFMD Annual Conference last week, my colleague from Durham University, Philip Warwick (who has written several times for this blog), summed things up in one short mail. “ I didn’t get time to read all of your posts in detail.” he confessed. “But the general idea that I got was that we don’t need to be as scared of MOOCs as we used to be.” Absolutely.


Martin Schader talked abou hype cycles in new technology

At the conference, Martin Schader gave a very down to earth view of MOOCs and their impact on higher education. Yes, they are developing, but we are now starting to get some perspective on their impact. They are an addition to education and learning rather than being something that will totally revolutionise it. As Mr. Schader pointed out, when any new technology comes along, there is a tendency to get caught up by the hype to begin with and  then to go through a cycle of readjustment. This begins with over inflated expectations of what can be done, plunges towards total disillusionment before climbing back to a position where there can be meaning production and use of the technology. We are perhaps now moving into this area. The question that remains however is the one of the economic model. This still seems harder to grasp.

The Economic Model

It seems strange that for all the discussion of MOOCs in the past few years, the economics of it seems to have been forgotten. The basic question is how do you make money when you are giving the course away. On the one side you have the dedicated MOOC providers such as EdX, Coursera, Udacity etc. In his outline of the activities of Coursera, Vivek Goel, was clear on this. Each course can cost up to $200 000 with an average cost of $30 000. The company does not charge for signing up to the course, but makes its profit from the $50 it charges for a certificate from the university once the course has been completed. This seems like a standard micro purchasing model and is easy to understand.


For business schools, however, the model seems less clear. Generating money from a MOOC still seems difficult for two reasons. Firstly, there is the question of barriers to entry. As far as MOOCs are concerned, these are practically zero. There are potentially several hundred thousand professors in the world that could potentially create a “MOOC” with just an iPhone. For sure, the quality would not be as good as a $200 000 production, but is might still get the message across. Secondly, switching costs are also very low (a student can zap from one short MOOC to another with little difficulty which is not the case in traditional learning). So, lots of people can provide “MOOCs” easily and cheaply and the low switching costs means students can move as soon as they are asked to pay. In this context, it seems large to envisage how a school can break even on the provision of a MOOC.

Opportunity Cost in MOOCs

This is an important (and largely ignored) issue because there is the real question of opportunity cost. If a school wants to invest tens of thousands of euros on making a MOOC, it should be able to justify some return on investment. Otherwise, it can use that same money to buy in professors, equip rooms etc. Interestingly, the main argument that was put forward was one of advertising for the institution. By offering a MOOC in a niche area that corresponds to the speciality of the school, indirect publicity can be generated leading to more applications to the school in the traditional manner. Again, there is some logic to this though it does seem rather ironic because advertising has traditionally been one of the most difficult expenses to justify.

Perhaps then higher education is now ready to move into the next phase which will entail the more formalized structuring of MOOCs. On the one side, there will be the large players with a total dedication to providing MOOCs and on the other higher educational institutions which will offer niche market programmes in order to generate greater awareness of their specializations rather than to generate profit. This at least would seem to be a business model and industry structure that is reflected elsewhere. It might not be as exciting as the tales of revolution   but at least it is more real than some of the (Loch Ness) monsters we have been searching for over the past few years.


Martin Scader pointed out the forecasts have changed in the past few months.


See also:

  Business Week 2014 – Day 1 – Fresh PlanetBusiness Week 2014 – Day 1 – Fresh Planet

We had the pleasure to meet Mathieu Nouzareth, a serial entrepreneur and former student of both GEM and Pace University. He is currently CEO and founder of Fresh Planet, a company of social gaming developing games for Facebook.

EFMD Annual Conference 2014: Plenary V – Panel on Technology & Blended ProgrammesRichard Straub

Richard Straub, introduced the final session of the EFMD Conference 2014, stating then blended learning seemed outdated and the need to discuss what would go beyond this methodology and take us to the next stage.

EFMD Annual Conference 2014: the SmartEcole project at EM Normandy


At the EFMD Annual Conference 2014, Olivier Lamirault & Laurence Hélène outlined the SmartEcole project that has been developed at EM Normandy in France. The school had in fact begun working on e-learning and blended learning pedagogies 15 years ago. With the SmartEcole, the idea was to the use the feedback they had had, their experience of blended learning with teaching practices known to improve the quality of learning and employability. Accordingly, they worked on individualization, engagement, learning by doing, collaborative work, formal and informal learning

Peter Drucker Forum 2013: “Cyber Security” panel contribution by Mikko Kosonen

miko kosonen

Mikko Kosonen, the President for the Finnish Innovation Fund (Sitra) since 2008, with experience in companies such as Nokia, TeliaSonera Finland Oyj, The Foundation for Economic Education, Kuntien Tiera Oy, Technology Academy Finland, Fifth Element Oy, Kesko, Itella Corporation and Hewlett-Packard Corp, concentrated in a short talk, on one main problem, that of cyber security.


Filed under Business Schools, Conference, E-learning, Education, Higher Education, Information Technology, Innovation, Strategy, Technology

3 responses to “MOOCs: the (Loch Ness) Monster of Higher Education?

  1. Shared =) I do enjoy that they are great taste-testers!

  2. Mark Thomas

    Thanks for sharing the post, Tanny. I just stole a few minutes to read through some of the new posts on your blog. It is getting better and better!

  3. Pingback: EFMD Annual Conference 2014: Breakout sessions- A4 – Roundtable on New Technologies & Accreditation | GlobalEd

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s